Intel P4 Platform
Roadmap Analysis

by Bert McComas
Analyst, InQuest Market Research
August 15, 2000

After a Series of Somewhat Tainted Product Releases, What's Next for Chip Giant Intel?

page 3 of 3

 

 

 

 

Intel Pentium 4 Roadmap graphic
(continued from page 2)

Chip Sets: Brookdale
In July, Intel revealed that it has plans for an SDRAM chip set for its Pentium 4 processor family. This chip set is named Brookdale, and is paired with the ICH3 chip. Brookdale will sample to OEMs and board manufacturers in early Q2 ’01 and will go to production in late Q3 ’01.

Current Intel documentation on Brookdale describes support for SDRAM only, mentioning exclusively PC133. However, direct feedback from OEMs indicate that when pressed, key Intel personnel will admit that it is a dual mode design supporting both DDR and SDR at the component level. OEMs will have to commit to either to DDR or SDR at board design time -- both DRAM types cannot be supported in a single board implementation. In light of the availability of DDR support, it is extremely unlikely that any manufacturer (other than perhaps Intel) will do an SDR design.

Given today’s competitive market, and Intel’s probable need in Q3 ’01 to aggressively recover market share, common sense would suggest that a 64-bit PC133 platform design for the then "fastest x86 processor on earth" is a formula for disaster. DDR will be in the mainstream well before Brookdale is ready in Q3’01. Intel does not have to evangelize this aspect of the chip set design in order to enable this transition. This gives Intel the emotional cushion it needs to ease back into the path of the rest of the industry -- even if a bit late.

Still, OEMs speculate that at IDF in August, Intel marketing may hold to the message that Brookdale will support only single data rate PC133. The story from Intel engineering seems to be that Brookdale is a dual mode design, but that marketing will decide when and how to reveal that to the market. If marketing holds to the PC133 story at IDF, Intel may wait to reveal its DDR capability until some time after AMD customers successfully ramp DDR platforms to high volume production. If this sequence of events comes to pass, Intel might be forced to artificially spin off a unique DDR version of the chip with a different name in order to avoid further embarrassment.

The bottom line is that Brookdale needs to be the “Pentium 4’s BX chip set.” The BX was designed to deliver flat out performance, with all of the features required in the market at the time. It was not manipulated by a marketing department, insisting that it should be made "slower than Camino" or de-featured for some strange reason. Intel is in desperate need of an unqualified hit, a decisive win, in the platform department. If the marketing department can understand this and let the engineers do their jobs, Brookdale will impress the world with an unmatched ability to extract every ounce of performance available from low cost PC266 SDRAM. The world might once again stand in awe.

Chip Sets: Almador
Almador has been in the industry rumor mills for several months. It is understood to be a DDR/SDR follow-on to the 815 chip set. It will be used with Coppermine and Tualatin processors. DDR support, if implemented at the board level, will boost the performance of the integrated 3D graphics controller and offer DRAM bandwidth matched to a possible 200MHz front side bus.

Though DDR support in Almador would help it to complete with Athlon, SDR would still have a place in low-end systems. We are at a loss, however, to imagine what real advantage an SDR Almador might have over the existing 815 for the low-end markets.

As a side observation, the currently integrated 740 graphics accelerator is showing its age, and Intel is in need of a new 3D graphics core for integration into future chip sets. It seems unlikely that Intel would re-architect its current 740-style 3D core. Rather, it is seems more logical that Intel would search outside for a higher performance licensable 3D core from yet another third party.

Though there are a number of possibilities, a tile based rendering approach (such as from Gigapixel - recently acquired by 3dfx) might be an interesting option for several reasons. Tile based 3D accelerator designs can consume lots of silicon, but deliver admirable performance with a very low external bandwidth budget. We currently have no particular insight on Intel’s future graphics integration strategy, but merely offer this commentary as food for thought.

Next Generation Chip Sets
In 2002, Intel indicates two new P4 chip sets spanning the entire system price range from $1000 upward. The original Intel version of this diagram denoted the "Next Gen Mainstream" chip set as being "SDRAM." Technologists will acknowledge that "SDRAM" can mean either SDR or DDR. This is one additional piece of evidence that the term "SDRAM" in this roadmap and its accompanying presentation probably means both SDR and DDR. Does anyone really expect Intel to introduce a brand new PC133 chip set for Northwood in Q2 of 2002?

Summary Analysis
In the ceaseless debate over DRAM types, this roadmap update from Intel introduces additional vital perspective. We acknowledge that as the Pentium 4 becomes available, Pentium III will move solidly to the midrange. The market opportunity for high priced P3 platforms will quickly dwindle -- resulting in a quick ramp down of 820 and 840 systems. Demand will quickly shift to the 815 and to third party chip sets.

By the end of this year, the market for RDRAM in Personal Computers will be restricted entirely to Tehama (and perhaps Timna -- the future of which seems uncertain to us). Over the next two years, Intel’s roadmap indicates that RDRAM will be relegated exclusively to platforms costing over $2000 -- dipping below $2000 in the summer of 2002 based on a chip set that is not described at any level of detail.

Though it seems that Intel is finally re-balancing its platform strategies to meet genuine market requirements, there are still some serious challenges lurking in the woods. The "Dead Zone" is real and Intel is fully exposed to an onslaught from Athlon+DDR.

Bert McComas is founder of InQuest Market Research. He has 15 years experience in technical marketing of computer chipsets, analog and power ICs, and computer boards and systems.

back to page 1:
The Big Picture and Pentium 4 Willamette


top   home  search  news  buyer's guide  reviews  technology  out-of-the-box   resources  talk back   contact      

webmaster@digitalmedianet.com